Glacial lake outburst floods threaten millions globally

Glacial lake outburst floods (GLOFs) represent a major hazard and can result in significant loss of life. Globally, since 1990, the number and size of glacial lakes has grown rapidly along with downstream population, while socio-economic vulnerability has decreased. Nevertheless, contemporary exposure and vulnerability to GLOFs at the global scale has never been quantified. Here we show that 15 million people globally are exposed to impacts from potential GLOFs. Populations in High Mountains Asia (HMA) are the most exposed and on average live closest to glacial lakes with ~1 million people living within 10 km of a glacial lake. More than half of the globally exposed population are found in just four countries: India, Pakistan, Peru, and China. While HMA has the highest potential for GLOF impacts, we highlight the Andes as a region of concern, with similar potential for GLOF impacts to HMA but comparatively few published research studies.카지노사이트

Glaciers are particularly sensitive to changes in climate1,2,3 and are highly visible indicators of climate warming3,4,5. Over the last three decades there have been substantial decreases in global glacier mass, with ice losses between 2006 and 2016 estimated at −332 ± 144 Gt y−16,7. This decline is likely to persist through the 21st century as most glaciers are out of balance with present climate; ~36 ± 8% of current mass loss is a ‘lagged response’ to past climate forcing8. In many areas, overdeepenings in former glacier beds are uncovered during the course of glacier retreat, which allows melt water to collect as glacial lakes9,10,11. Glacial lakes can also form via the growth and coalescence of supraglacial ponds on debris-covered glaciers12,13, and in other ice-marginal settings14,15. The formation of glacial lakes can trigger positive feedbacks, whereby lakes promote further ice loss through calving and subaqueous melting, causing additional melt and retreat, and further lake expansion16,17,18.

Importantly, these lakes can represent a substantial hazard in the form of glacial lake outburst floods (GLOFs). GLOF triggering is complex, with dam breach initiation caused by mass movement-induced impulse waves19,20, lake overfilling due to pluvial, nival and glacial runoff21, and moraine- or ice dam degradation being variably important dependent on setting22,23. Consequently, the probability of a lake releasing a GLOF is difficult to accurately quantify without detailed and localised studies.

GLOFs can be highly destructive and can arrive with little prior warning, causing significant damage to property, infrastructure, and agricultural land, and resulting in extensive loss of life. However, the impact varies significantly across the globe; in the last 70 years, several thousand people have been killed by GLOFs in the Cordillera Blanca alone24,25, most from a small number of events26,27, while only 393 deaths in the European Alps can be directly linked to GLOF activity over the last 1000 years28. The continued ice loss and expansion of glacial lakes due to climate change therefore represents a globally important natural hazard that requires urgent attention if future loss of life from GLOF is to be minimised29,30 and the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals (particularly Goal 11—Disaster Risk Reduction) are to be met.

Since 1990, the number, area, and volume of glacial lakes globally has grown rapidly, increasing by 53%, 51%, and 48% respectively30. Concurrent with the rapid growth of glacial lakes, many catchments downstream have experienced rapid and large increases in population, infrastructure and hydroelectric power (HEP) schemes, while agriculture has intensified31,32,33,34,35. However, the socio-economic vulnerability to climate-related hazards is thought to have decreased36, although this decrease is spatially heterogenous and it remains unclear if this heterogeneity is sufficient to offset potential increases in hazard and exposure. Contemporaneous changes in lake conditions and downstream damage potential (i.e., the combination of exposure—the proximity of populations to a potential outburst—and vulnerability—the exposed populations likelihood to be impacted by the GLOF) are all critical components of GLOF danger10,31,37,38. 바카라사이트 However, how the recent observed changes in each combine to produce contemporary global GLOF danger remains unclear29. While regional scale GLOF risk assessments have been undertaken39,40, to our knowledge, no global scale study has been attempted that considers not just the physical lake conditions, but also societal exposure and vulnerability that directly influence GLOF danger41.

Here we combine the most up-to-date lake condition, exposure, and vulnerability data available to quantify and rank contemporary (2020) damage potential from GLOFs at a global scale, adding to similar recent approaches for hydrometeorological floods42,43. We analyse the spatial distribution of population exposure to determine where populations are in relation to glacial lakes, using necessarily simple estimates of potential GLOF runout paths (50 km runout, with potentially affected populations located within 1 km of a river course), therefore identifying potential GLOF danger hotspots and thus higher priority zones for mitigation and further, local-scale research. While this study captures lake conditions and damage potential as they were in 2020, the methods presented provide a framework to capture changing GLOF danger through time.

Lake conditions
As of 2020, regional normalised GLOF lake conditions, represented in terms of the total number and area of glacial lakes, were highest in the Pacific Northwest (PNW; 1.000), and lowest in the European Alps (0.041) (Fig. S1). There was high variability between nations, with individual GLOF lake conditions highest in Greenland and Canada (1.000 and 0.685 respectively) and lowest in Ecuador (0.001). Excluding Uzbekistan (no glacial lakes, normalised hazard score of zero) the largest range in intra-regional GLOF lake condition scores were seen in High Mountain Asia (HMA), ranging from a high score in China (0.319) to a low score in Mongolia (0.006). Generally, normalised national GLOF lake condition scores in HMA are below 0.100, with the exception of China.

In total, 90 million people across 30 countries live in 1089 basins containing glacial lakes (Fig. 1a). Our analysis indicates that of these, 15 million (16.6%) live within 50 km of a glacial lake and 1 km of potential GLOF runout tracks (Fig. 1a). We find that 62% (~9.3 million) of the globally exposed population are located in the HMA region. Globally, the proportion of exposed population varies significantly between countries; India and Pakistan contain the highest number of exposed people (~3 million and ~2 million people respectively, or one-third of the global total combined) while Iceland contains the least (260 people) (Fig. 1b). Just four highly populous countries account for >50% of the globally exposed population: India, Pakistan, Peru, and China (Fig. 2a). As a result, regionally HMA has the highest normalised exposure score (1.000) while the High Arctic and Outlying Countries score the lowest (0.019). India and Pakistan are the highest individually scoring nations (1.000 and 0.701), and Sweden is the lowest (0.001).온라인카지노

Similar Posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.